Sales of drinks padded the profits of the bowling alley's owners, and many bowling alleys of this period included bars to increase revenue and attract customers. A bar on premises, Sakiba, designed by Armet and Davis's interior designer, Helen Liu Fong (d. The bowling experience was also fueled by alcohol. Originally the coffee shop served only western fare, but that was soon modified to meet the multi-ethnic tastes of the clientele." The coffee shop served hamburgers, udon, grits and Louisiana hot links. Food service was an important part of the experience at the Holiday Bowl, especially during tournaments when the participants might eat two meals on the premises. The bowling alley was open twenty-four hours to accommodate swing shifts of individuals working at local aerospace plants. At the Holiday Bowl, Japanese and African-American clientele were catered to in a variety of ways. One of the favorite forms of recreation in the community was bowling, which many Japanese-Americans took up before World War II, at the time when it was the fastest growing sport in the United States. By the 1950s, second and third generation Japanese-Americans had settled in the Crenshaw District, making it one of the largest Japanese-American communities in Los Angeles. During the postwar period, the Crenshaw District re-established its community of Japanese and African-Americans, embracing returning soldiers and Japanese-American families interned during the war. Since its closure, the Holiday Bowl has become a symbol for historic preservationists and neighborhood advocates, who point to it as an example of an architecturally significant, successful cross-cultural meeting place that was not respected by city officials.Īrchitectural historian Lauren Weiss Bricker has written of the 32-lane Holiday Bowl: "Holiday Bowl was built by four Japanese-American businessmen on land they leased. Landmark status did not protect it, however, as the developer claimed economic hardship and the building was removed in 2003. The City of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission designated the building as Los Angeles Historic Cultural Monument #688 on. After its closure, a developer purchased the land and sought to demolish the landmark, claiming that a Googie building could have no social or architectural significance. By 2000, bowling had gradually lost its appeal for many, and the lanes closed. The complex became, at a time of still prevalent segregation in Los Angeles, an area of common ground, where various races could meet and relax. Ownership of the Holiday Bowl changed periodically, as did menus served in the coffee shop, tweaked periodically to satisfy its multi-ethnic clientele. Their widespread work helped spread the popularity of "Googie" architecture well beyond Southern California. Transparency allowed for the interior activity to draw customers inside. Structural members were often emphasized in unusual ways adding to their buildings' unconventional and novel appearances. Roof forms, particularly of their restaurants, tended to be highly sculptural, deriving in some cases from work by Frank Lloyd Wright, Rudolph Schindler and John Lautner, with large expanses of windows to enable the interiors to be seen from a distance. Armet and Davis produced buildings easily visible from moving automobiles. Los Angeles architects, Armet and Davis, designed the Holiday Bowl this firm was well-known for its roadside architecture, focusing on the design of coffee shops, bowling alleys, and other common building types lining suburban streets of the 1950s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |